Introduction
The Basic Structure Doctrine is a legal principle established by judicial interpretation in several countries, notably in India, which asserts that certain fundamental features of a constitution are immutable and cannot be altered by amendment. This doctrine has far-reaching implications for constitutional interpretation, limiting the powers of legislative bodies and protecting the foundational framework of the constitution from arbitrary changes.
Evolution of Basic Structure Doctrine in India
- Basic Structure encompasses basic and core values which form the bedrock of the Indian Constitution.
- It is a Judicially innovative doctrine that is neither defined under the Constitution nor defined by the Supreme Court or any other court.
- Various judgments of the Supreme Court form the bedrock of the Basic Structure Doctrine.
- Present Position: Under Article 368, Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights, but without affecting the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution.
Cases | Description |
Shankari Prasad Case 1951 |
|
Golaknath Case 1967 |
|
Parliament’s Reaction to Golaknath Case |
|
Kesavananda Bharati Case 1973 |
|
39th Amendment 1975 |
|
Indira Nehru Gandhi Case 1975 |
|
42nd Amendment 1976 |
|
Minerva Mills Case 1980 |
|
Waman Rao case 1981 |
|
IR Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu, 2007 |
|
|
Elements of Basic Structure Doctrine
- The Supreme Court has yet to provide a definitive definition of the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution.
- However, from various judgments, certain elements or components have been identified as the ‘basic features’ of the Constitution as its ‘basic structure’ as given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|